The best smart locks combine dependable entry with access methods that suit your household. I rank the Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Deadbolt as the best overall for its built-in Wi-Fi and familiar deadbolt format; the Eufy Security Smart Lock C220 stands out for fingerprint entry and Wi-Fi, while the ULTRALOQ Bolt SE is a strong choice for buyers interested in Matter over Thread. The main tradeoffs are between simple keypad access, app-based remote control, biometric convenience, and the extra setup or compatibility checks that connected features can bring. Handle-and-knob models also differ from deadbolts, so the lock must match your door and security needs. Read on for how all 15 options compare and which type of buyer each best suits.
Get kitchen gear delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Complete the kit
Key Takeaways
- Built-in Wi-Fi separates the most convenient connected picks: Schlage Encode, Yale Wi-Fi, Eufy C220, and several Philips models can support remote functions without relying on a separate plug-in bridge, though app and network requirements still vary.
- Access method matters more than a long feature list: TEEHO TE001 models focus on keypad entry, while the Eufy C220, Veise VE017, and fingerprint handle options add biometric access for households that prefer not to enter a code.
- Deadbolts and handle locks solve different installation needs: Schlage Encode and the Philips Wi-Fi deadbolt are deadbolt-format choices; several Philips, Yamiry, and generic options include a handle or knob and require a closer fit check.
- Connectivity is not interchangeable: ULTRALOQ Bolt SE’s Matter over Thread positioning differs from locks advertising direct Wi-Fi, so buyers should verify hub, Thread border router, platform, and remote-access requirements before choosing.
- Finish and trim variants do not change the core decision: The Schlage Encode and TEEHO TE001 each appear in two finishes, making door style a final selection rather than a reason to treat each version as a different feature tier.
| TEEHO TE001 Keyless Entry Deadbolt with Keypad for Front Door, Matte Black |  | Best Value for Keypad-Only Entry | Model: TE001 | Material: Aluminum alloy | Finish: Matte Black | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Deadbolt Lock with Century Trim, Matte Black |  | Best for Remote Access and Security | Model: BE489WBCEN622 | Finish and trim: Matte Black, Century trim | Connectivity: Wi-Fi | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Keypad Smart Door Knob Lock with Fingerprint and Keyless Entry |  | Best for Multiple Unlocking Methods | Material: Aluminum | Finish: Matte Black | Dimensions: 5.62 x 2.69 x 3 in | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock, Keyless Entry Door Lock |  | Best for Built-In Wi-Fi and High Code Capacity | Model: DDL242X-1HW | Connectivity: 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi | Power: AA alkaline batteries, not included | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Smart Door Handle Lock with Keypad, Yamiry Fingerprint Knob for Front Door |  | Best for Reversible Handle Installation | Model: Yamiry YR01 | Item type: Listed as a smart deadbolt lock; product title describes a fingerprint knob | Recommended use: Indoor and exterior doors | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips WiFi Keypad Door Lock with Handle, Built-in WiFi, APP Remote Control, Voice & Fingerprint Unlock, Satin Nickel |  | Best for Built-In Remote Access | Connectivity: 2.4GHz WiFi | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, PIN code, app remote control, Alexa and Google Assistant voice control | Auto-lock: Adjustable from 0 to 180 seconds | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| TEEHO TE001 Keyless Entry Deadbolt with Keypad, Satin Nickel |  | Best Value Keypad Deadbolt | Model: TE001 | Finish: Satin Nickel | Material: Aluminum alloy | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with Handle & Keypad – Keyless Entry, Remote Access, Alexa & Google Compatible |  | Best for Flexible Household Access | Model: Sifely S | Lock type: Deadbolt | Material and finish: Zinc, Satin Nickel | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Deadbolt Lock with Century Trim, Satin Nickel |  | Best for Security-Focused WiFi Access | Model: BE489WBCEN619 | Finish and trim: Satin Nickel, Century trim | Connectivity: WiFi | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Keypad Smart Door Knob Lock with Handle |  | Best for Simple Keypad Entry | Material: Aluminum alloy | Dimensions: 5.62 x 2.7 x 3 inches | Weight: 1.18 kg | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ULTRALOQ Bolt SE Wi-Fi Smart Lock, Matter Over Thread, App Remote Access |  | Best for Flexible Access | Connectivity: Wi-Fi, Matter over Thread | Fingerprint capacity: 50 | Passcode capacity: 50 | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Yale Wi‑Fi Smart Lock Deadbolt with Keypad, Black Suede |  | Best for Guest Access | Model: YRD410-WF1-BSP | Finish: Black Suede | Connectivity: Wi-Fi, 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Veise VE017 Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with App Control, Matte Black |  | Best for Fingerprint-Focused Households | Material: All-zinc alloy, scratch-resistant | Connectivity: Wi-Fi via separately sold G1 Gateway | Battery life: At least 12 months | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Eufy Security Smart Lock C220, Keyless Entry with Fingerprint and Wi-Fi |  | Best for Built-In Wi-Fi Convenience | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, app, keypad, physical key, voice | Connectivity: Built-in Wi-Fi; no bridge required | Battery life: Up to 8 months | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips 4200 Series WiFi Smart Deadbolt with Handle |  | Best Complete Lock-and-Handle Set | Model: 4200 Series (DDL242X-1HW-L) | Connectivity: 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, PIN code, app, voice assistant | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| smart lock | Connectivity | Model |
|---|---|---|
| TEEHO TE001 Keyless Entry Dead | — | TE001 |
| Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Dead | Wi-Fi | BE489WBCEN622 |
| Keypad Smart Door Knob Lock wi | Bluetooth; Wi-Fi gateway required for remote access | — |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt L | 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi | DDL242X-1HW |
| Smart Door Handle Lock with Ke | — | Yamiry YR01 |
| Philips WiFi Keypad Door Lock | 2.4GHz WiFi | — |
| TEEHO TE001 Keyless Entry Dead | — | TE001 |
| Fingerprint Smart Door Lock wi | Bluetooth and WiFi | Sifely S |
| Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Dead | WiFi | BE489WBCEN619 |
| Keypad Smart Door Knob Lock wi | Not specified | — |
| ULTRALOQ Bolt SE Wi-Fi Smart L | Wi-Fi, Matter over Thread | — |
| Yale Wi‑Fi Smart Lock Deadbolt | Wi-Fi, 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz | YRD410-WF1-BSP |
| Veise VE017 Fingerprint Smart | Wi-Fi via separately sold G1 Gateway | — |
| Eufy Security Smart Lock C220 | Built-in Wi-Fi; no bridge required | — |
| Philips 4200 Series WiFi Smart | 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required | 4200 Series (DDL242X-1HW-L) |
More Details on Our Top Picks
TEEHO TE001 Keyless Entry Deadbolt with Keypad for Front Door, Matte Black
I’d pick the TEEHO TE001 for a straightforward move away from keys, especially when several household members or regular guests need their own codes. It stores 20 user codes and adds a temporary one-time code, while automatic locking helps avoid leaving the deadbolt unlocked by mistake. Compared with the Schlage Encode, it skips Wi-Fi and remote app control; that means fewer connected features, but also a simpler keypad-focused setup. Its IP54 weather resistance and stated battery life of up to 365 days suit an exposed entry better than a lock that depends on frequent battery changes. The tradeoffs are its ANSI Grade 3 security level and fit requirements: it won’t work with 38 mm door holes, and you’ll need to supply four AA batteries.
Pros:- Stores 20 user codes and supports a temporary one-time guest code.
- Automatic locking can reduce the chance of leaving the door unlocked.
- IP54 weather resistance suits many exterior entry points.
- Stated battery life of up to 365 days limits routine battery changes.
Cons:- ANSI Grade 3 security level is a limitation for buyers prioritizing a higher stated grade.
- Does not offer the Wi-Fi remote management listed for the Schlage Encode.
- Four AA batteries are not included, and the lock does not fit 38 mm door holes.
Best for: Households and small landlords who want separate keypad codes and automatic locking without app-based remote access.
Not ideal for: Buyers who need remote control, voice-assistant integration, or a higher stated security grade, and anyone with a 38 mm door hole.
- Model:TE001
- Material:Aluminum alloy
- Finish:Matte Black
- Access codes:20 user codes; temporary one-time code
- Battery:4 AA batteries, not included
- Stated battery life:Up to 365 days
- Weather resistance:IP54
- Door fit:Compatible with 2-1/8 in (54 mm) door holes; not compatible with 38 mm holes
- Warranty:2 years
Our verdict“Choose the TEEHO TE001 for durable, code-based entry and auto-locking, but skip it if you need connected control or a higher stated security grade.”
Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Deadbolt Lock with Century Trim, Matte Black
The Schlage Encode is the clearest fit here for buyers who want to manage a deadbolt away from home: its built-in Wi-Fi supports app control without adding a separate gateway, and it works with Alexa and Google Home. Encryption, a built-in alarm, and a fingerprint-resistant touchscreen give it a more security-focused feature set than the keypad-only TEEHO TE001. The benefit is greater visibility and control when you’re away; the cost is more reliance on connectivity and battery upkeep. Schlage lists battery life of up to six months, shorter than the TEEHO’s stated figure, and remote features require Wi-Fi. The touchscreen may also be less dependable for buyers who prefer physical buttons. I’d choose it for connected access management, not for the longest interval between battery changes.
Pros:- Built-in Wi-Fi enables app-based remote access without a separate gateway.
- Works with Alexa, Google Home, Schlage Home, and Key by Amazon apps.
- Encryption and a built-in alarm add security features beyond a basic keypad deadbolt.
- Includes four AA batteries and installation hardware.
Cons:- Listed battery life is up to six months, so battery changes may be relatively frequent.
- Remote control features depend on a Wi-Fi connection.
- Touchscreen sensitivity may not suit buyers who favor tactile buttons.
Best for: Homeowners who want to manage guest access remotely and use Alexa or Google Home with a Wi-Fi deadbolt.
Not ideal for: Buyers without reliable Wi-Fi, those seeking long battery intervals, or anyone who prefers physical keypad buttons.
- Model:BE489WBCEN622
- Finish and trim:Matte Black, Century trim
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi
- Smart home compatibility:Alexa, Google Home, Schlage Home app, Key by Amazon app
- Battery:4 AA batteries, included
- Stated battery life:Up to 6 months
- Security features:Encryption, built-in alarm, fingerprint-resistant touchscreen
- Warranty:Limited lifetime mechanical and finish; 3-year electronics
Our verdict“Pick the Schlage Encode if remote management and connected security matter more than battery longevity or a tactile keypad.”
Keypad Smart Door Knob Lock with Fingerprint and Keyless Entry
This fingerprint door knob puts choice ahead of remote convenience: users can enter by fingerprint, keypad, app, key fob, or physical key. That flexibility can help a busy household avoid sharing one entry method, and the stated capacity of 50 passwords and fingerprints makes it more accommodating than the TEEHO TE001’s 20 user codes. Its Bluetooth connection supports local app control, while remote control requires a separately sold Wi-Fi gateway; unlike the Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt, it isn’t presented as having built-in Wi-Fi. That distinction matters if you want access management from outside the home. It is a knob-style lock rather than a deadbolt, so buyers replacing a deadbolt should check the door hardware and security needs before choosing it. App setup may also take patience.
Pros:- Offers fingerprint, keypad, app, key fob, and physical-key entry.
- Stores up to 50 passwords and fingerprints.
- Aluminum construction is described as corrosion-resistant.
- Bluetooth supports app control, with optional gateway-based remote control.
Cons:- Remote access requires a Wi-Fi gateway sold separately.
- The 50-entry capacity may not suit users who need a larger credential list.
- App setup may be complex, and a knob lock may not replace a deadbolt.
Best for: Households that want fingerprint entry plus several backup methods and can manage access locally or add a separate gateway.
Not ideal for: Buyers who need built-in Wi-Fi remote access or specifically want a deadbolt rather than a door knob lock.
- Material:Aluminum
- Finish:Matte Black
- Dimensions:5.62 x 2.69 x 3 in
- Weight:1.18 kg
- Credential capacity:50 passwords and fingerprints
- Connectivity:Bluetooth; Wi-Fi gateway required for remote access
- Entry methods:App, touch, fingerprint, keypad, key fob, physical key
- Style:Modern; round or oval shape
Our verdict“Choose this knob lock for varied local entry methods, but choose a built-in Wi-Fi deadbolt such as the Philips if remote access is a priority.”
Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock, Keyless Entry Door Lock
The Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt combines a broad set of entry methods with built-in remote connectivity: app, passcode, fingerprint, physical key, and voice commands are all listed, with no separate hub required. Its support for up to 100 custom passcodes gives it more room for household members and guests than the TEEHO TE001, which stores 20 codes. Real-time notifications and auto-lock add useful awareness and routine security, while away mode offers another setting for periods when the home is empty. Compared with the Schlage Encode, Philips lists more passcodes and fingerprint access, but this model only supports 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi and requires buyers to provide AA alkaline batteries. It also lacks a door sensor, so notifications should not be mistaken for confirmation that the door is physically closed.
Pros:- Built-in Wi-Fi provides remote access without an extra hub.
- Supports app, fingerprint, passcode, physical-key, and voice-command entry.
- Up to 100 custom passcodes can accommodate a large set of users or guests.
- Auto-lock, away mode, and real-time notifications support everyday access management.
Cons:- Connects only to 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi.
- AA alkaline batteries are not included.
- No door sensor detects whether the door is open or closed.
Best for: Households and hosts who want built-in Wi-Fi, fingerprint entry, remote notifications, and many custom passcodes.
Not ideal for: Buyers using only 5 GHz Wi-Fi or those who need the lock to report whether the door itself is open or closed.
- Model:DDL242X-1HW
- Connectivity:2.4 GHz Wi-Fi
- Power:AA alkaline batteries, not included
- Door thickness compatibility:1-3/8 to 2 in
- Passcode capacity:Up to 100 custom passcodes
- Entry methods:App, passcode, fingerprint, physical key, voice commands
- Features:Remote control, voice control, auto-lock, away mode, real-time notifications
- Included components:One door lock
Our verdict“Choose the Philips for built-in remote access and a large passcode roster, but skip it if you need door-position sensing or 5 GHz Wi-Fi support.”
Smart Door Handle Lock with Keypad, Yamiry Fingerprint Knob for Front Door
The Yamiry YR01 suits buyers who want a handle-style lock with several ways to enter and a reversible design for left- or right-handed doors. Fingerprint, app, passcode, key fob, and mechanical-key access give it more variety than the TEEHO TE001, which centers on keypad codes and a one-time guest code. App-based access management is useful for landlords or households issuing temporary entry, but remote control and Alexa voice unlocking depend on a separate Wi-Fi gateway. That makes the Yamiry less self-contained than the Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt, which lists built-in Wi-Fi. The supplied mechanical keys also offer a backup if electronic entry is unavailable. Buyers should note the product data’s inconsistency: the title describes a knob, while the item type calls it a smart deadbolt, so confirm its hardware format before ordering.
Pros:- Combines fingerprint, app, passcode, key fob, and mechanical-key entry.
- Reversible handle is listed as compatible with left- and right-handed doors.
- App-based access management supports temporary codes and remote control when paired as described.
- Includes two key fobs, two mechanical keys, and an adjustable latch.
Cons:- A separate Wi-Fi gateway is required for Alexa voice unlocking and remote features.
- App setup may be complex.
- Product information is inconsistent about whether the hardware is a knob or deadbolt, so fit should be verified.
Best for: Landlords and homeowners with left- or right-handed doors who want fingerprint and code entry plus app-based access management.
Not ideal for: Buyers who require remote access or Alexa unlocking without a separate gateway, or who need an unambiguous deadbolt-versus-knob fit.
- Model:Yamiry YR01
- Item type:Listed as a smart deadbolt lock; product title describes a fingerprint knob
- Recommended use:Indoor and exterior doors
- Door orientation:Reversible for left- and right-handed doors
- Entry methods:Fingerprint, app, passcode, key fob, mechanical key, Alexa voice command
- Remote access:Separate Wi-Fi gateway required
- Included accessories:Two key fobs, two mechanical keys, screw set, adjustable latch
- Included assemblies:Exterior assembly and interior assembly
Our verdict“Consider the Yamiry for flexible handle orientation and multiple entry methods, but verify the lock format and gateway requirements before buying.”
Philips WiFi Keypad Door Lock with Handle, Built-in WiFi, APP Remote Control, Voice & Fingerprint Unlock, Satin Nickel
The Philips WiFi Keypad Door Lock combines a handle set with fingerprint, PIN, app, and voice entry, so household members can choose what suits them while you manage access remotely. Its built-in 2.4GHz WiFi avoids the separate gateway needed for remote access on the Sifely S, making this a more direct fit for buyers who want app control without an extra hub. Fingerprint access also offers a quick alternative to entering a code at the door. The tradeoff is dependence on compatible 2.4GHz WiFi and an app setup that may take patience; the TEEHO TE001 is simpler if keypad codes are enough. It also takes eight AA batteries, sold separately, more than the four used by the TEEHO.
Pros:- Fingerprint, PIN, app, and compatible voice-assistant entry provide several ways to get inside.
- Built-in WiFi enables remote app control without a separate gateway.
- Handle set is included, making it a complete handle-and-lock option.
- Adjustable auto-lock delay can be set from 0 to 180 seconds.
Cons:- Requires a 2.4GHz WiFi network for connected features.
- Eight AA batteries are required and are not included.
- App setup may be more involved than using a keypad-only lock such as the TEEHO TE001.
Best for: Households that want fingerprint entry, a complete handle set, and remote app control without adding a separate WiFi gateway.
Not ideal for: Buyers with no 2.4GHz WiFi, or anyone who prefers a basic keypad deadbolt with fewer app setup steps.
- Connectivity:2.4GHz WiFi
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, PIN code, app remote control, Alexa and Google Assistant voice control
- Auto-lock:Adjustable from 0 to 180 seconds
- Handle set:Included
- Compatible door thickness:1-3/8 to 1-3/4 inches (38–50 mm)
- Batteries:8 AA alkaline batteries, not included
Our verdict“Choose this Philips if you want fingerprint entry and built-in remote access in a handle set, and skip it if you need a simple, WiFi-free keypad lock.”
TEEHO TE001 Keyless Entry Deadbolt with Keypad, Satin Nickel
The TEEHO TE001 is the straightforward choice for buyers who want shared PIN access without app management or WiFi. It stores up to 20 user codes and supports one-time guest PINs, a useful distinction from the Philips WiFi Keypad Door Lock, whose appeal centers on fingerprints and remote control. An IP54 rating and aluminum-alloy construction suit a door exposed to ordinary weather, while auto-lock and anti-peeping code entry add practical safeguards. Installation needs only a screwdriver, though the lock must be reset to detect door handing, and its 54mm door-hole requirement is narrower than the Philips model’s stated door-thickness compatibility. With backup keys and a stated battery life of up to 365 days, it prioritizes uncomplicated local access over connected features.
Pros:- Supports up to 20 user codes and one-time guest PINs.
- Tool-friendly installation requires only a screwdriver.
- IP54 weather resistance and aluminum-alloy construction suit exterior use.
- Includes two backup keys and has a stated battery life of up to 365 days.
Cons:- Does not offer the app-based remote access or fingerprint entry found on the Philips WiFi Keypad Door Lock.
- Requires a 54mm door hole, limiting fit on doors with other hole sizes.
- Four AA batteries are required and not included, and a reset is needed for door-direction detection.
Best for: Landlords, families, and shared households that need multiple PINs and temporary guest codes but do not need smartphone or voice control.
Not ideal for: Buyers who want remote access, fingerprint unlocking, or have a door hole that does not match the specified 54mm size.
- Model:TE001
- Finish:Satin Nickel
- Material:Aluminum alloy
- Power:4 AA batteries, not included
- Stated battery life:Up to 365 days
- Weather resistance:IP54
- User codes:20, with one-time guest PIN support
- Door-hole compatibility:2-1/8 inches (54 mm)
- Security grade:ANSI Grade 3
Our verdict“Pick the TEEHO TE001 for durable, code-based access with guest PINs, but choose a connected model if you need to manage the lock remotely.”
Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with Handle & Keypad – Keyless Entry, Remote Access, Alexa & Google Compatible
The Sifely S suits homes where access needs vary: it supports fingerprint, keypad, app, fob, and key entry, giving family members or guests alternatives to a shared PIN. Compared with the TEEHO TE001, it offers more entry methods and app management; compared with the Philips WiFi Keypad Door Lock, remote access depends on an optional WiFi Gateway rather than built-in WiFi. That makes the Sifely a flexible setup, but not the simplest one for buyers who want remote control straight from the box. Its DIY installation and reversible handle appeal to renters or hosts with standard doors, while the listed fit limitation means unusual door dimensions could be a problem. Voice control is also tied to the gateway for remote commands.
Pros:- Offers fingerprint, passcode, app, fob, and key access.
- DIY installation and a reversible handle accommodate many standard door setups.
- Supports app-based access management and Alexa and Google Assistant compatibility.
- Includes two keys and two key cards.
Cons:- Remote unlocking and voice commands require a separate WiFi Gateway.
- The extra gateway makes setup less direct than the Philips WiFi Keypad Door Lock.
- Fit is limited to most standard doors, with compatibility not specified for every door dimension.
Best for: Short-term rental hosts and busy households with standard doors that need several entry methods and are willing to add a WiFi Gateway for remote access.
Not ideal for: Buyers seeking built-in WiFi remote access without extra equipment, or those with nonstandard doors that may not fit its stated installation range.
- Model:Sifely S
- Lock type:Deadbolt
- Material and finish:Zinc, Satin Nickel
- Connectivity:Bluetooth and WiFi
- Control methods:App, remote, touch, and voice
- Entry methods:Fingerprint, passcode, fob, app, and key
- Dimensions:7 x 3 x 1.12 inches
- Included keys and cards:2 keys and 2 key cards
Our verdict“Choose the Sifely S if your household benefits from many entry methods and you accept a separate gateway for remote access.”
Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Deadbolt Lock with Century Trim, Satin Nickel
The Schlage Encode is the strongest fit here for buyers who want app-based remote access from a deadbolt with stated security features, including an encrypted connection and built-in alarm. Its WiFi connection is built in, so there is no separate gateway requirement like the Sifely S has for remote unlocking. Compared with the fingerprint-equipped Philips WiFi Keypad Door Lock, the Schlage focuses more on a connected deadbolt and alarm features than on biometric entry or an included handle set. Alexa and Google Home compatibility add voice control, and the included four AA batteries reduce the immediate setup burden. The tradeoff is a stated battery life of up to six months, which may mean more frequent changes than the TEEHO TE001’s stated life of up to 365 days.
Pros:- Built-in WiFi supports remote management through the Schlage Home app.
- Includes a built-in alarm and an encrypted connection.
- Works with Alexa and Google Home voice control.
- Four AA batteries are included, and installation does not require hardwiring.
Cons:- Stated battery life is up to six months, shorter than the TEEHO TE001’s stated battery life.
- Remote features rely on a WiFi connection.
- Does not offer the fingerprint entry listed for the Philips WiFi Keypad Door Lock.
Best for: Homeowners who want a WiFi-connected deadbolt with app management, an alarm, and an encrypted connection, and whose doors meet standard dimensions.
Not ideal for: Buyers who prioritize long stated battery life, fingerprint unlocking, or a handle set included with the lock.
- Model:BE489WBCEN619
- Finish and trim:Satin Nickel, Century trim
- Connectivity:WiFi
- Backset:2-3/8 or 2-3/4 inches
- Compatible door thickness:1-3/8 to 1-3/4 inches
- Batteries:4 AA batteries, included
- Stated battery life:Up to six months
- Security features:Built-in alarm and encrypted connection
- Warranty:Limited lifetime mechanical and finish; 3-year electronics
Our verdict“Choose the Schlage Encode for connected deadbolt access with alarm and encryption features, but look elsewhere if fingerprint entry or fewer battery changes matter more.”
Keypad Smart Door Knob Lock with Handle
This Yamiry keypad lock is the simplest fit for buyers who want coded entry and auto-locking on a door without making WiFi or app control part of the setup. It supports up to 20 user codes, has a backlit touch keypad, and includes backup keys, offering more shared-code capacity than a basic single-code approach. Unlike the Schlage Encode, however, its connectivity is not specified, so I would not choose it for remote management or voice-assistant control. Its IP54 weather resistance and aluminum-alloy construction add exterior-use practicality, but the keypad may be less responsive in extreme weather. The 5-to-99-second auto-lock range gives users some control over relocking, while buyers who want fingerprints or app access should compare it with the Sifely S instead.
Pros:- Stores up to 20 user codes for household members or guests.
- Auto-lock delay is adjustable from 5 to 99 seconds.
- IP54 weather resistance and aluminum-alloy construction suit exterior doors.
- Includes backup keys and a low-battery indicator.
Cons:- Connectivity is not specified, so remote app management and voice control cannot be assumed.
- Keypad responsiveness may be affected in extreme weather.
- Requires batteries, and battery life is not specified.
Best for: Households that need multiple keypad codes, backup keys, and automatic relocking without relying on app or voice features.
Not ideal for: Buyers who need remote access, fingerprint entry, or confirmed WiFi or Bluetooth support.
- Material:Aluminum alloy
- Dimensions:5.62 x 2.7 x 3 inches
- Weight:1.18 kg
- User codes:20
- Auto-lock range:5 to 99 seconds
- Weather resistance:IP54
- Control method:Touch keypad
- Connectivity:Not specified
- Color:Matte Black
Our verdict“Pick this Yamiry for straightforward multi-code keypad access, but choose the Sifely S or Schlage Encode if you need connected control.”
ULTRALOQ Bolt SE Wi-Fi Smart Lock, Matter Over Thread, App Remote Access
The ULTRALOQ Bolt SE suits households that want several ways to get through the door: fingerprint, passcode, app, voice control, or a mechanical key. Its 18-month stated battery life is longer than the Eufy Security Smart Lock C220’s eight months, which means fewer planned battery changes. Matter over Thread adds smart-home flexibility, but remote Thread access depends on a compatible hub; its Wi-Fi connection is also limited to 2.4 GHz. That makes it less straightforward for buyers who want built-in Wi-Fi without extra ecosystem requirements, as the C220 offers. The IP65 weather resistance and DIY installation suit exposed exterior doors, though a door sensor is not included, so it cannot confirm the door is closed from the supplied hardware.
Pros:- Offers fingerprint, passcode, app, voice, and mechanical-key entry.
- Stated battery life of up to 18 months reduces routine battery maintenance.
- IP65 weather resistance suits exterior-door use.
- Supports Matter over Thread alongside Wi-Fi.
Cons:- Remote access over Thread requires a compatible Matter over Thread hub.
- Wi-Fi works only on 2.4 GHz.
- Door sensor is not included.
Best for: Households that want fingerprint, code, key, and smart-home access options, plus long intervals between battery changes.
Not ideal for: Buyers who want Thread remote access without a compatible hub, need 5 GHz Wi-Fi, or expect a door sensor in the package.
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi, Matter over Thread
- Fingerprint capacity:50
- Passcode capacity:50
- Battery life:Up to 18 months
- Material:Zinc alloy
- Weather resistance:IP65 waterproof
- Auto-lock:Yes
- Installation time:About 10 minutes
Our verdict“Choose the ULTRALOQ Bolt SE if you want varied entry methods and long stated battery life, and are prepared to check your hub and network needs.”
Yale Wi‑Fi Smart Lock Deadbolt with Keypad, Black Suede
The Yale Assure Lock 2 is the strongest fit here for households that regularly grant and manage entry for guests, cleaners, or service providers. Its unlimited user codes can be scheduled or set to expire, while DoorSense reports whether the door is closed—a useful distinction between locking the bolt and securing the actual door. Unlike the ULTRALOQ Bolt SE, Yale connects to Wi-Fi without relying on a separate Thread hub, and it supports both 2.4 and 5 GHz networks. Auto-unlock and Apple Watch access add convenience, but the lock depends on a stable Wi-Fi connection; weak coverage can undercut remote control. Its included backup key is reassuring, though buyers seeking fingerprint entry should look at the ULTRALOQ Bolt SE or Eufy C220 instead.
Pros:- Unlimited user codes support scheduled and expiring guest access.
- DoorSense can confirm whether the door is closed.
- Wi-Fi remote control works without a separate hub and supports 2.4 and 5 GHz.
- Includes a backup key and supports Apple Watch access.
Cons:- Remote features depend on a stable Wi-Fi connection.
- Does not offer fingerprint entry.
- Electronic warranty is limited to one year.
Best for: Families, landlords, and homeowners who issue temporary or scheduled codes to visitors and want confirmation that the door is closed.
Not ideal for: Buyers who prioritize fingerprint unlocking, have unreliable Wi-Fi at the entrance, or want a lock with no network dependence.
- Model:YRD410-WF1-BSP
- Finish:Black Suede
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi, 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz
- Security grade:BHMA Grade 2
- Door thickness compatibility:1-3/4 to 2-1/4 inches
- Bore hole:2-1/8 inches
- Operating temperature:-22°F to 140°F
- Included access features:Keypad, app, Apple Watch, backup key, DoorSense
Our verdict“Pick Yale if managing many guest codes and checking door status matter more than fingerprint access.”
Veise VE017 Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with App Control, Matte Black
The Veise VE017 puts biometric entry and access monitoring at the center of its appeal. Its AI-assisted fingerprint recognition, encrypted local storage, activity logs, and anti-peeping password feature give security-minded households more to work with than a keypad-only option such as the TEEHO TE001. It also supports app, key, and voice-assistant access, but remote app access requires the separately sold G1 Gateway. That extra component makes the setup less direct than the Eufy Security Smart Lock C220, which has built-in Wi-Fi. The VE017’s no-drill DIY installation may suit owners who want a simpler fitting, while its 4 AA batteries are not included and its listed battery life is at least 12 months. Buyers should be ready to spend time on setup and verify their door fit.
Pros:- Fingerprint, keypad, app, key, and voice-assistant access options.
- Activity logs, AES128 encryption, and anti-peeping password support.
- No-drill DIY installation is designed for left- or right-handed doors.
- Listed battery life is at least 12 months.
Cons:- Remote access requires a separately sold G1 Gateway.
- Four AA batteries are not included.
- Setup may be complex for buyers who want a quick, uncomplicated installation.
Best for: Homeowners or small multi-tenant properties that prioritize fingerprint access, entry logs, and customizable permissions.
Not ideal for: Buyers who want remote control straight from the lock without purchasing a gateway, or who prefer a simpler setup and included batteries.
- Material:All-zinc alloy, scratch-resistant
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi via separately sold G1 Gateway
- Battery life:At least 12 months
- Battery type:4 AA/LR6 alkaline batteries, not included
- Security features:AES128 encryption, activity logs, anti-peeping password, intrusion alarm
- Voice assistant compatibility:Alexa and Google Assistant
- Installation:DIY, no drilling required; left- and right-handed doors
- Warranty:1-year limited, with a 1-year extension upon registration
Our verdict“Choose the Veise VE017 if fingerprint entry and access logs matter more than built-in remote connectivity.”
Eufy Security Smart Lock C220, Keyless Entry with Fingerprint and Wi-Fi
The Eufy Security Smart Lock C220 is a convenient pick for buyers who want fingerprint entry and remote app control without adding a bridge or Thread hub. It combines built-in Wi-Fi with keypad, key, and voice-assistant access, making its connection setup more direct than the Veise VE017, which needs a separate G1 Gateway for remote access. The tradeoff is battery upkeep: the C220’s stated eight-month battery life is shorter than the ULTRALOQ Bolt SE’s 18 months, and it uses eight AA batteries. Its IP53 rating offers less stated water protection than the ULTRALOQ’s IP65 rating, so exposure conditions matter. The C220’s Grade 3 certification and compatibility with most standard deadbolts make it a practical choice, but non-standard hardware may not fit.
Pros:- Built-in Wi-Fi enables remote control without a bridge.
- Fingerprint, app, keypad, physical key, and voice entry are supported.
- Designed for easy installation on most standard deadbolts.
- Operating range is listed from -22°F to 158°F.
Cons:- Eight AA batteries are required, with a stated battery life of eight months.
- IP53 offers less listed water protection than the ULTRALOQ Bolt SE’s IP65 rating.
- May not fit non-standard deadbolt hardware.
Best for: Homeowners who want fingerprint entry and built-in Wi-Fi remote control without buying a separate hub.
Not ideal for: Buyers seeking longer stated battery life, higher listed water resistance, or compatibility with non-standard deadbolts.
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, app, keypad, physical key, voice
- Connectivity:Built-in Wi-Fi; no bridge required
- Battery life:Up to 8 months
- Battery type:8 AA batteries
- Weather resistance:IP53
- Certification:BHMA Grade 3
- Operating temperature:-22°F to 158°F
- Deadbolt compatibility:Most standard deadbolts; bores under 54 mm
Our verdict“Choose the Eufy C220 for straightforward built-in Wi-Fi and fingerprint access, provided its battery needs and deadbolt fit work for your door.”
Philips 4200 Series WiFi Smart Deadbolt with Handle
The Philips 4200 Series stands apart by including a matching handle set, making it a better fit for buyers replacing both pieces of door hardware rather than upgrading a deadbolt alone. It connects directly to 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi with no hub, unlike the Veise VE017, which needs an optional gateway for remote access. Its 0.3-second fingerprint access and PIN entry give household members quick alternatives to the app, while Alexa and Google Assistant add voice control. The main compromise is a stated battery life of up to six months, shorter than the Eufy C220 and far shorter than the ULTRALOQ Bolt SE. Check the door specifications before buying: it fits 1-3/8- to 1-3/4-inch doors, is designed for right-opening doors by default, and needs manual reset for left-opening doors.
Pros:- Includes a matching handle set as well as the smart deadbolt.
- Direct 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi supports app access without a hub.
- Fingerprint recognition is listed at 0.3 seconds.
- Supports PIN codes and Alexa and Google Assistant voice control.
Cons:- Battery life is listed at up to six months, and batteries are not included.
- Stable Wi-Fi connection calls for placement within 33 feet of the router.
- Left-opening doors require a manual reset.
Best for: Homeowners replacing a deadbolt and handle together who want fingerprint and PIN entry with direct Wi-Fi app control.
Not ideal for: Buyers with left-opening doors who want a simple out-of-box fit, doors outside the listed thickness range, or those seeking longer battery life.
- Model:4200 Series (DDL242X-1HW-L)
- Connectivity:2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, PIN code, app, voice assistant
- Fingerprint speed:0.3 seconds
- Battery life:Up to 6 months
- Battery type:1.5V alkaline batteries, not included
- Door thickness compatibility:1-3/8 to 1-3/4 inches
- Auto-lock:Yes; adjustable from 0 to 180 seconds, off by default
Our verdict“Choose the Philips 4200 Series when you need a matched handle and deadbolt set, and your door dimensions and opening direction are compatible.”
How We Picked
I compared these 15 smart locks around the decisions that affect daily use: lock format, available entry methods, connectivity, remote-control potential, platform compatibility, and installation fit. A keypad-only deadbolt can be a sensible choice for households that want code access without adding app dependence, while Wi-Fi and fingerprint features can make entry more flexible for families or frequent guests. I also treated included handles as a fit and convenience distinction, not an automatic security advantage.
The ranking gives preference to models whose listed features offer a clear, useful balance of access options and connected functionality, while accounting for setup complexity and compatibility checks. That puts the Schlage Encode first as a well-rounded Wi-Fi deadbolt, with Eufy C220 and ULTRALOQ Bolt SE close behind for distinct biometric and smart-home strengths. Keypad-focused TEEHO models rank as practical value-minded choices, while less clearly specified handle and fingerprint models rank lower because buyers may need to verify app support, door fit, and ecosystem details before purchase.
Factors to Consider When Choosing Smart Locks
Before choosing from this lineup, match the lock to your door and the way people actually enter. Smart access is only useful when it fits your routine, and extra connectivity can add setup steps without improving everyday convenience for every household.
Match the Lock Format to Your Door
Start by identifying whether you need a deadbolt replacement, a knob, or a handle set with a lock. These formats are not interchangeable, and a handle lock may not replace the separate deadbolt that provides your main barrier. Check your door’s existing bore holes, backset, thickness, handing, and space around the trim against the manufacturer’s installation details. A lock that includes a handle can reduce the need to coordinate finishes, but it may also mean replacing more hardware than you planned. A common mistake is choosing by appearance before confirming fit. If you rent or want to keep changes limited, a deadbolt-only replacement may be the simpler route, subject to your lease and door configuration.
Choose Access Methods for the People Who Use the Door
Keypads work well when several people need access and you want to share or change codes rather than hand out keys. Fingerprint entry can speed up entry for regular users, but it may be less convenient for visitors, children whose fingerprints change, or anyone whose hands are wet or dirty. A physical key backup can matter when batteries fail or electronics misbehave, so check whether a particular model includes one rather than assuming every smart lock does. Think through deliveries, caregivers, guests, and household members before paying for multiple access methods. More unlock options can mean more flexibility, but also more setup, app permissions, and maintenance. Pick the methods your household will actually use.
Understand Wi-Fi, Thread, and Remote Access
Remote locking and access alerts depend on more than the lock itself: the home network, app, phone permissions, and any required hub all play a part. Direct Wi-Fi models can avoid a separate bridge, but they still need a suitable wireless signal at the door and may place more demands on batteries. Matter over Thread is a different setup path; confirm that your smart-home system has the required Thread border router and supports the functions you want. Do not assume that a Matter label means every feature works identically across platforms. If you mainly need a keypad at the door, paying for always-connected access may add little. If you manage access while away, confirm remote features and ecosystem compatibility before buying.
Balance Convenience Against Battery and Network Upkeep
Connected locks rely on batteries, and wireless features can affect how often you need to check or replace them. Fingerprint readers and keypads add useful ways to enter, but they also introduce components that need to remain responsive and clean. Review the maker’s battery guidance, low-battery alerts, emergency power procedure, and backup-entry options before installation. A deadbolt with fewer connected features may suit a door where simple code access is enough, while a remote-access lock can justify extra upkeep for a busy household. Avoid treating battery life claims as a guarantee because use, signal strength, and settings can change results. A small maintenance routine is part of owning an electronic lock.
Decide Which Smart-Home Features You Will Use
Compatibility matters most when you already use a voice assistant, automation platform, or shared smart-home system. Check the exact lock model and the functions supported by your platform: basic voice status, locking, and remote guest access may have different requirements. Some buyers only need an app to manage codes; others want the lock to work with routines or a broader Matter setup. Avoid choosing by a logo or general compatibility claim alone, since the same lock may offer different controls across ecosystems. If multiple household members use different phones or platforms, prioritize straightforward account sharing and reliable local entry. Simpler systems can be easier to maintain than automations nobody uses.
Pay for Features That Solve a Real Access Problem
A premium connected deadbolt makes sense when remote control, alerts, or integration will meaningfully improve how you manage the door. A keypad-focused model may be the better value if your main goal is leaving keys behind, and a fingerprint reader is most compelling when quick personal entry is a daily need. Handle bundles can be worthwhile when you are replacing both pieces of hardware, but less so if your existing handle is in good condition. Compare the full installation and compatibility requirements, not just the feature names. Consider who will administer access over time and how easily codes can be removed when a guest or service provider no longer needs them. The right spend is the one tied to a specific use case, not the longest spec sheet.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is a Wi-Fi smart lock worth choosing over a keypad-only lock?
A Wi-Fi lock is useful when you want to manage access while away, check status remotely, or receive connected alerts. If you only need household members to enter with codes at the door, a keypad-only model such as the TEEHO TE001 may cover the main need with fewer network-related steps. Direct Wi-Fi can also affect battery upkeep, and performance depends on a strong signal near the door. Check whether the lock needs a hub and what remote functions its app supports. Choose Wi-Fi for a specific remote-access benefit, not just because it sounds more advanced.
Should I choose a fingerprint lock or a keypad lock for a family?
A keypad can be easier to share among a changing group because you can issue separate codes, depending on the lock’s supported code management. Fingerprint access is convenient for regular users who want fast entry without remembering a code, but guests and new household members may still need another method. For a family, think about children, caregivers, and visitors as well as the adults who will use the door every day. A model combining fingerprint and keypad entry offers flexibility, though it adds setup and another feature to maintain. Keep a backup entry method available whichever approach you choose.
Will a smart lock work with my existing deadbolt and door?
Do not assume that a smart lock fits just because your current door has a lock. Some products replace a deadbolt, while others are built as knobs or handle sets and need different holes and hardware. Measure the door and compare its thickness, backset, bore-hole layout, and clearance with the exact model’s installation specifications. Also check whether your existing handle can remain in place or must be replaced as part of the installation. If you rent or have a nonstandard door, confirm permission and fit before ordering.
What do I need to check before buying a Matter over Thread lock?
Confirm that your smart-home system supports the lock and that you have the required Thread border router; Matter and Thread are related but do not mean a lock connects directly to every phone or router. Check which functions work through your chosen platform, including remote control, user management, and alerts. The ULTRALOQ Bolt SE’s Matter over Thread approach may suit a home already built around compatible equipment, while a Wi-Fi model may be more direct for buyers who want app access without building a Thread setup. Read the model-specific requirements rather than relying on general ecosystem labels. If you do not use smart-home automations, a simpler keypad or Wi-Fi choice may be easier.
Can I keep using my smart lock if the power or internet goes out?
It depends on the model and on which function you need during the outage. A lost internet connection can disable remote app functions while local keypad, fingerprint, or key entry may still work, but you should verify this for the exact lock. A depleted battery is a separate issue, so check for a physical key, emergency power method, or other manufacturer-specified backup. Keep the lock’s emergency instructions accessible and pay attention to low-battery warnings. Do not rely on an unverified assumption that every smart lock offers the same fallback options.
Conclusion
For most buyers, I recommend the Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Deadbolt as the best overall pick because it pairs a familiar deadbolt format with built-in Wi-Fi access. The TEEHO TE001 is my value-minded choice for shoppers whose priority is keypad entry rather than remote features, while the ULTRALOQ Bolt SE is the premium smart-home option for buyers prepared to check its Matter over Thread requirements. Beginners who want a straightforward way to leave keys behind should start with a keypad-focused deadbolt and confirm installation fit before adding connected features. For fingerprint convenience, compare the Eufy Security Smart Lock C220 with the Veise VE017 and other biometric options; for a door needing new handle hardware, focus on the Philips and handle-set models. Match the lock format, access method, and connectivity to your actual door and routine before choosing.
Halloween Picks
halloween
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
