TL;DR
Get kitchen gear delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
A publisher’s platform in Food Safety News describes seven petitions submitted or being prepared for the FDA and USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service. The proposals seek changes to infant-formula testing, food warnings, poultry controls, outbreak sampling and disclosure; the source does not establish that either agency has accepted or acted on them.
A Food Safety News publisher’s platform describes seven petitions to the FDA and USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service, asking the agencies to change or formalize practices involving food testing, consumer warnings and outbreak investigations. The proposals cover powdered infant formula, raw-milk cheese, sprouts, poultry, animal feeding operations and the naming of firms linked to outbreaks; the account does not report agency decisions on the petitions.
The author, a food-safety lawyer, says the petitions were developed with colleagues, scientists, physicians, families affected by outbreaks and other food-safety advocates. The article presents them as requests to agencies, not adopted rules. Several ask regulators to follow through on earlier commitments or extend existing approaches to additional foods.
One petition asks FDA to require testing of finished powdered infant formula for botulinum neurotoxin-producing clostridia, as well as testing of dairy ingredients used in formula. The author cites 52 infants hospitalized with botulism in the ByHeart and Nara Organics outbreaks since 2023 and says the organism was found in a dairy ingredient. The petition was filed with 46 parents representing 24 of the infants, according to the article.
Two other FDA petitions seek prescribed warnings on raw-milk cheese and packaged raw or lightly cooked sprouts. The cheese proposal also asks FDA to complete its review of the 60-day aging rule and require cheesemakers relying on aging to validate its effectiveness. The sprouts proposal would extend warnings to products sold within salads, sandwiches and wraps, reflecting FDA advice to higher-risk groups that the author says has not appeared on packaging.
The FSIS petition asks the agency to treat Salmonella at or above 1 colony-forming unit per gram as an adulterant in raw ground chicken and turkey and raw chicken parts, or alternatively in products carrying three specified serotypes. It also asks for verification sampling. The author says FSIS made a similar determination for breaded stuffed raw chicken in May 2024, but a broader rulemaking was withdrawn in April 2025 and sampling was postponed indefinitely in December 2025.
Two further FDA petitions address outbreak investigations. One seeks narrow, time-limited access to animal feeding operations when the agency has determined in writing that a site is implicated in a multistate outbreak, for environmental and animal sampling. The other asks FDA to clarify that identities of firms implicated by epidemiological and traceback or laboratory evidence are not confidential commercial information. The source’s description of this final petition ends before setting out its full requested disclosure standard.
From Agency Advice to Consumer Warnings
The proposals address points where information or safeguards may not reach consumers and investigators: testing requirements for ingredients and finished products, warnings at the point of purchase, and access to potential outbreak sources. If adopted, the requests could affect what manufacturers test, what labels say and what information regulators release during investigations.
For consumers, the warning petitions focus on foods the author says pose particular risks to some groups, including pregnant people, older adults, young children and people with weakened immune systems. For companies and agencies, the poultry and disclosure proposals could carry regulatory and operational consequences. Those are potential effects, not outcomes established by the article: the petitions seek agency action, and the source provides no decisions or implementation dates.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Earlier Rules and Unfinished Actions
The author frames the petitions as requests to apply existing authority or complete work that regulators have previously discussed. The article says FDA has advised certain higher-risk groups against eating raw sprouts for 28 years but has not required a package warning. It also describes the raw-milk cheese aging standard as dating to the 1940s and says FDA announced a reevaluation in 2013.
For poultry, the article points to FSIS’s May 2024 determination concerning breaded stuffed raw chicken and a later, withdrawn rulemaking covering other raw poultry. For outbreak investigations, it cites FDA’s sampling at a feedlot after the 2018 Yuma romaine outbreak and says the agency identified firms in similar circumstances at least eight times since 2006. These are the author’s account of the regulatory record; the article does not include agency responses to the new petitions.
“No seizures, no husbandry rules, no financial records. Just samples.”
— The petition author, describing the requested feeding-operation access
Agency Decisions Remain Unreported
The source does not say whether FDA or FSIS has acknowledged, accepted, rejected or scheduled action on each petition. It also does not provide agency comments, a response timetable or a complete account of the requested disclosure language, because the supplied article text cuts off during that petition’s description.
The outbreak figures and regulatory history are presented by the petition author. The source does not include underlying agency documents or independent verification of those details. It is also unclear whether the agencies will open rulemaking, revise guidance, respond through another process or take no action.
Petition Responses and Rulemaking
The next developments depend on how FDA and FSIS respond to the requests. Readers should watch for agency acknowledgments, formal responses, proposed rules, changes to testing or labeling guidance, and decisions about sampling authority and disclosure practices. The source gives no dates for those steps.
Until agencies announce action, the proposals remain petitions rather than binding requirements. Existing food-safety rules and agency advice remain separate from the changes the author is asking regulators to make.
Key Questions
What are the seven petitions asking for?
They seek expanded testing of powdered infant formula and its dairy ingredients; warnings on raw-milk cheese and raw or lightly cooked sprouts; Salmonella controls and sampling for additional raw poultry; limited FDA sampling access at outbreak-linked animal feeding operations; and clearer disclosure of firms implicated in outbreaks. The source’s description of the last petition is incomplete.
Have FDA or FSIS adopted the proposals?
The source reports petitions asking for agency action but does not say that either agency adopted the requests, opened rulemaking or issued a response.
What does the formula petition propose?
It asks FDA to add botulinum neurotoxin-producing clostridia to finished-product testing requirements for powdered infant formula and to require testing of dairy-based ingredients used to make it.
As described by the author, it seeks access for environmental and animal sampling only when FDA has determined in writing that an operation is implicated in a multistate outbreak. The proposed access would be narrow and time-limited, with no seizure, husbandry or financial-record authority requested.
When are agency decisions expected?
The article provides no response deadlines or expected decision dates. The status of each petition will depend on announcements or formal actions by FDA and FSIS.
Source: rss
Halloween Picks
halloween
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
